the only a few comments at this point in time.
I cannot find the person(s) that have brought up the issue, tried to
convince the working group that there is a problem for years and have
submitted documents to explain the issue anywhere in the document (neither
as author(s), contributor(s) nor anything else).
That cannot be right.
I don't see the guys who implemented this specification (based on Martin's
clarifications) listed in the document either. We should acknowledge their
work a bit more ("Remember: Rough consensus and RUNNING CODE") given that
they are the poor folks who had to decipher our mysterious specifications
and very likely spent a lot of time doing so.
Ciao
Hannes
________________________________
From: geopriv-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:geopriv-bounces@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Bernard Aboba
Sent: 05 June, 2009 08:06
To: geopriv@ietf.org
Subject: [Geopriv] -00 Strawman of RFC 3825bis for Review
Starting from the text of RFC 3825, I have produced a strawman -00
draft of RFC 3825bis:
http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/GEOPRIV/draft-ietf-geopriv-rfc3825bis-00.txt
Comments welcome.
Other than the editorial changes outlined in Appendix B, the basis
of the -00 strawman is RFC 3825, so that no technical differences should
have been introduced. Just to make sure, I have compared the text to RFC
3825 line by line.
The -00 strawman generates no errors or warings when reviewed by
the ID-NITS tool (see below).
On checking the URLs provided in the Reference section, two
questions arose:
a. EPSG. One of the URLs given for the EPSG now resolves to the IHS
site map:
http://www.ihsenergy.com/epsg/geodetic2.html
Does this URL need to be updated, removed or left as is?
b. WGS 84. There is no longer a web site configured at the cited
URL:
http://www.wgs84.com/
Is there an updated URL available?
===========================================
ID-NITS output
idnits 2.11.11
tmp/draft-ietf-geopriv-rfc3825bis-00.txt:
Checking boilerplate required by RFC 5378 and the IETF Trust (see
http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info):
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
No issues found here.
Checking nits according to
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
No issues found here.
Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
No issues found here.
Miscellaneous warnings:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- The document has a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 work, but was
first
submitted on or after 10 November 2008. Does it really need
the
disclaimer?
Checking references for intended status: Proposed Standard
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(See RFCs 3967 and 4897 for information about using normative
references
to lower-maturity documents in RFCs)
-- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative reference: ref. 'EPSG'
-- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative reference: ref. 'WGS84'
Summary: 0 errors (**), 0 warnings (==), 3 comments (--).
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
