Friday, June 5, 2009

Re: [Geopriv] -00 Strawman of RFC 3825bis for Review

All -
 
The EPSG information page is now here: http://info.ogp.org.uk/geodesy/
 
and the EPSG registry is here: http://www.epsg-registry.org/
 
The WGS 84 document is here:
 
Cheers

Carl
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 11:06 PM
Subject: [Geopriv] -00 Strawman of RFC 3825bis for Review

Starting from the text of RFC 3825, I have produced a strawman -00 draft of RFC 3825bis:
http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/GEOPRIV/draft-ietf-geopriv-rfc3825bis-00.txt

Comments welcome.

Other than the editorial changes outlined in Appendix B, the basis of the -00 strawman is RFC 3825, so that no technical differences should have been introduced.   Just to make sure, I have compared the text to RFC 3825 line by line.

The -00 strawman  generates no errors or warings when reviewed by the ID-NITS tool (see below). 

On checking the URLs provided in the Reference section, two questions arose:

a. EPSG.  One of the URLs given for the EPSG now resolves to the IHS site map:
http://www.ihsenergy.com/epsg/geodetic2.html

Does this URL need to be updated, removed or left as is?

b. WGS 84.  There is no longer a web site configured at the cited URL:
http://www.wgs84.com/ 

Is there an updated URL available? 

===========================================
ID-NITS output

idnits 2.11.11 

tmp/draft-ietf-geopriv-rfc3825bis-00.txt:

  Checking boilerplate required by RFC 5378 and the IETF Trust (see
  http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info):
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

     No issues found here.

  Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt:
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

     No issues found here.

  Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html:
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

     No issues found here.

  Miscellaneous warnings:
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

  -- The document has a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 work, but was first
     submitted on or after 10 November 2008.  Does it really need the
     disclaimer?


  Checking references for intended status: Proposed Standard
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

     (See RFCs 3967 and 4897 for information about using normative references
     to lower-maturity documents in RFCs)

  -- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative reference: ref. 'EPSG'

  -- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative reference: ref. 'WGS84'


     Summary: 0 errors (**), 0 warnings (==), 3 comments (--).














_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
Posted by at