>-----Original Message-----
>From: James M. Polk [mailto:jmpolk@cisco.com]
>Sent: 05 June, 2009 11:52
>To: Hannes Tschofenig; 'Bernard Aboba'; geopriv@ietf.org
>Subject: Re: [Geopriv] -00 Strawman of RFC 3825bis for Review
>
>Hannes
>
>Please re-read what Richard said about this -- (paraphrasing)
>
> "the -00 version of this doc will be the text from RFC 3825
> *with* the new boilerplate, and that's all."
>
>-01 and beyond will have changed text, based on WG consensus
>of what needs to be changed (i.e., Alissa's 6 items, at least).
>
>James
>
>At 02:54 AM 6/5/2009, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
>>Hi Bernard,
>>
>>the only a few comments at this point in time.
>>
>>I cannot find the person(s) that have brought up the issue, tried to
>>convince the working group that there is a problem for years and have
>>submitted documents to explain the issue anywhere in the document
>>(neither as author(s), contributor(s) nor anything else).
>>
>>That cannot be right.
>>
>>I don't see the guys who implemented this specification (based on
>>Martin's
>>clarifications) listed in the document either. We should acknowledge
>>their work a bit more ("Remember: Rough consensus and RUNNING CODE")
>>given that they are the poor folks who had to decipher our mysterious
>>specifications and very likely spent a lot of time doing so.
>>
>>Ciao
>>Hannes
>>
>>________________________________
>>
>> From: geopriv-bounces@ietf.org
>>[mailto:geopriv-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bernard Aboba
>> Sent: 05 June, 2009 08:06
>> To: geopriv@ietf.org
>> Subject: [Geopriv] -00 Strawman of RFC 3825bis for Review
>>
>>
>> Starting from the text of RFC 3825, I have produced
>a strawman
>>-00 draft of RFC 3825bis:
>>
>>http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/GEOPRIV/draft-ietf-geopriv-rfc38
>25bis-00.
>>txt
>>
>> Comments welcome.
>>
>> Other than the editorial changes outlined in Appendix B, the
>>basis of the -00 strawman is RFC 3825, so that no technical
>differences should
>>have been introduced. Just to make sure, I have compared
>the text to RFC
>>3825 line by line.
>>
>> The -00 strawman generates no errors or warings
>when reviewed
>>by the ID-NITS tool (see below).
>>
>> On checking the URLs provided in the Reference section, two
>>questions arose:
>>
>> a. EPSG. One of the URLs given for the EPSG now resolves to
>>the IHS site map:
>>
>> http://www.ihsenergy.com/epsg/geodetic2.html
>>
>> Does this URL need to be updated, removed or left as is?
>>
>> b. WGS 84. There is no longer a web site configured at the
>>cited
>>URL:
>> http://www.wgs84.com/
>>
>> Is there an updated URL available?
>>
>> ===========================================
>> ID-NITS output
>>
>> idnits 2.11.11
>>
>> tmp/draft-ietf-geopriv-rfc3825bis-00.txt:
>>
>> Checking boilerplate required by RFC 5378 and the
>IETF Trust (see
>> http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info):
>>
>>--------------------------------------------------------------
>---------
>>-----
>>
>> No issues found here.
>>
>> Checking nits according to
>>http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt:
>>
>>--------------------------------------------------------------
>---------
>>-----
>>
>> No issues found here.
>>
>> Checking nits according to
>http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html:
>>
>>--------------------------------------------------------------
>---------
>>-----
>>
>> No issues found here.
>>
>> Miscellaneous warnings:
>>
>>--------------------------------------------------------------
>---------
>>-----
>>
>> -- The document has a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 work, but
>>was first
>> submitted on or after 10 November 2008. Does it really
>>need the
>> disclaimer?
>>
>>
>> Checking references for intended status: Proposed Standard
>>
>>--------------------------------------------------------------
>---------
>>-----
>>
>> (See RFCs 3967 and 4897 for information about using
>>normative references
>> to lower-maturity documents in RFCs)
>>
>> -- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative
>reference: ref. 'EPSG'
>>
>> -- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative
>reference: ref. 'WGS84'
>>
>>
>> Summary: 0 errors (**), 0 warnings (==), 3
>comments (--).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Geopriv mailing list
>>Geopriv@ietf.org
>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
