You need stronger justification for your case than an existence proof. Aside from the rhetoric, that's all I've seen so far.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geopriv-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:geopriv-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Andy Mabbett
> Sent: Tuesday, 9 June 2009 10:12 PM
> To: GEOPRIV
> Subject: Re: [Geopriv] draft-ietf-geopriv-geo-uri-00 brief comments
>
> In message
> <E51D5B15BFDEFD448F90BDD17D41CFF105DC23BA@AHQEX1.andrew.com>,
> "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com> writes
>
> >Notes on comparison (which likely cannot be held true if the whole
> >datum thing happens, another reason not to entertain the idea
> >further...)
>
> Why is that a reason not to entertain the idea further?
>
> --
> Andy Mabbett
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the designated recipient only and may
contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete the original. Any unauthorized use of
this email is prohibited.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[mf2]
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
