Hi Bernard,
a. It might be OK to use <http://info.ogp.org.uk/geodesy/CurrentDB.html> but OGP seem to shift occasionally.
b. I use the following reference:
[WGS84] US National Imagery and Mapping Agency, "Department of
Defense (DoD) World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS 84), Third
Edition", NIMA TR8350.2, January 2000.
<reference anchor="WGS84" target="">
<front>
<title>
Department of Defense (DoD) World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS 84), Third Edition
</title>
<author fullname="">
<organization>US National Imagery and Mapping Agency</organization>
</author>
<date day="3" month="January" year="2000"/>
</front>
<seriesInfo name="NIMA" value="TR8350.2"/>
</reference>
I'll provide some input once I have time to read through.
--Martin
From: geopriv-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:geopriv-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bernard Aboba
Sent: Friday, 5 June 2009 3:06 PM
To: geopriv@ietf.org
Subject: [Geopriv] -00 Strawman of RFC 3825bis for Review
Starting from the text of RFC 3825, I have produced a strawman -00 draft of RFC 3825bis:
http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/GEOPRIV/draft-ietf-geopriv-rfc3825bis-00.txt
Comments welcome.
Other than the editorial changes outlined in Appendix B, the basis of the -00 strawman is RFC 3825, so that no technical differences should have been introduced. Just to make sure, I have compared the text to RFC 3825 line by line.
The -00 strawman generates no errors or warings when reviewed by the ID-NITS tool (see below).
On checking the URLs provided in the Reference section, two questions arose:
a. EPSG. One of the URLs given for the EPSG now resolves to the IHS site map:
http://www.ihsenergy.com/epsg/geodetic2.html
Does this URL need to be updated, removed or left as is?
b. WGS 84. There is no longer a web site configured at the cited URL:
http://www.wgs84.com/
Is there an updated URL available?
===========================================
ID-NITS output
idnits 2.11.11
tmp/draft-ietf-geopriv-rfc3825bis-00.txt:
Checking boilerplate required by RFC 5378 and the IETF Trust (see
http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info):
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
No issues found here.
Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
No issues found here.
Checking nits according to http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
No issues found here.
Miscellaneous warnings:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- The document has a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 work, but was first
submitted on or after 10 November 2008. Does it really need the
disclaimer?
Checking references for intended status: Proposed Standard
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(See RFCs 3967 and 4897 for information about using normative references
to lower-maturity documents in RFCs)
-- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative reference: ref. 'EPSG'
-- Possible downref: Non-RFC (?) normative reference: ref. 'WGS84'
Summary: 0 errors (**), 0 warnings (==), 3 comments (--).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any unauthorized use of this email is prohibited. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ [mf2] |
