---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Reporter: martin.thomson@andrew.com | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: rfc3825bis | Version:
Severity: - | Keywords: altitude
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
RFC 3825 seems to indicate that an altitude type of 0 indicates that there
is no altitude defined. This needs to be clearer in the bis.
Q: is altitude type 0 valid?
Q: what meaning is attached to altitude type 0?
Q: what is the impact of having no altitude on the existing datum
definitions?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/geopriv/trac/ticket/8>
geopriv <http://tools.ietf.org/geopriv/>
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
