Tuesday, June 16, 2009

Re: [Geopriv] WG Review: Recharter ofGeographic Location/Privacy (geopriv)

Thanks for raising this issue, Guy.

I agree with you.

Ciao
Hannes

________________________________

From: geopriv-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:geopriv-bounces@ietf.org]
On Behalf Of ext Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk
Sent: 16 June, 2009 18:04
To: g.caron@bell.ca
Cc: geopriv@ietf.org; geopriv-bounces@ietf.org; iesg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] WG Review: Recharter ofGeographic
Location/Privacy (geopriv)



> I kindly ask that draft-winterbottom-geopriv-held-identity-
> extensions be considered for inclusion in the rechartered
geopriv
> Goals and Milestones. As discussed at the June 2008 geopriv
interim
> meeting, this extension to the basic HELD protocol is required
for
> some deployments.

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv