is "meters", so sea level would have altitude type 1 and altitude 0 (not
altitude type 0).
Glen Zorn wrote:
>> #8: Altitude type of 0 == no altitude
>> ---------------------------------------+-------------------------------
>> -----
>> Reporter: martin.thomson@andrew.com | Owner:
>> Type: defect | Status: new
>> Priority: major | Milestone:
>> Component: rfc3825bis | Version:
>> Severity: - | Keywords: altitude
>> ---------------------------------------+-------------------------------
>> -----
>> RFC 3825 seems to indicate that an altitude type of 0 indicates that
>> there
>> is no altitude defined.
>
> Just wondering: if that is really the case, how is sea level indicated?
>
>> This needs to be clearer in the bis.
>>
>> Q: is altitude type 0 valid?
>>
>> Q: what meaning is attached to altitude type 0?
>>
>> Q: what is the impact of having no altitude on the existing datum
>> definitions?
>>
>> --
>> Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/geopriv/trac/ticket/8>
>> geopriv <http://tools.ietf.org/geopriv/>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geopriv mailing list
>> Geopriv@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
