> ---------------------------------------+-------------------------------
> -----
> Reporter: martin.thomson@andrew.com | Owner:
> Type: defect | Status: new
> Priority: major | Milestone:
> Component: rfc3825bis | Version:
> Severity: - | Keywords: altitude
> ---------------------------------------+-------------------------------
> -----
> RFC 3825 seems to indicate that an altitude type of 0 indicates that
> there
> is no altitude defined.
Just wondering: if that is really the case, how is sea level indicated?
> This needs to be clearer in the bis.
>
> Q: is altitude type 0 valid?
>
> Q: what meaning is attached to altitude type 0?
>
> Q: what is the impact of having no altitude on the existing datum
> definitions?
>
> --
> Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/geopriv/trac/ticket/8>
> geopriv <http://tools.ietf.org/geopriv/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
