skip to main
|
skip to sidebar
geopriv@ietf.org
Tuesday, June 2, 2009
[Geopriv] Test
Test message, please ignore
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
Newer Post
Older Post
Home
Followers
Blog Archive
►
2012
(77)
►
June
(4)
►
May
(6)
►
April
(11)
►
March
(23)
►
February
(30)
►
January
(3)
►
2011
(333)
►
December
(13)
►
November
(23)
►
October
(35)
►
September
(14)
►
August
(13)
►
July
(24)
►
June
(30)
►
May
(30)
►
April
(33)
►
March
(37)
►
February
(18)
►
January
(63)
►
2010
(725)
►
December
(71)
►
November
(55)
►
October
(79)
►
September
(65)
►
August
(78)
►
July
(46)
►
June
(46)
►
May
(39)
►
April
(57)
►
March
(98)
►
February
(65)
►
January
(26)
▼
2009
(1062)
►
December
(22)
►
November
(120)
►
October
(167)
►
September
(229)
►
August
(40)
►
July
(287)
▼
June
(197)
Re: [Geopriv] loc-filters additional requirements
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Server Version Suppor...
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Server Version Suppor...
Re: [Geopriv] loc-filters additional requirements
[Geopriv] loc-filters additional requirements
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Server Version Suppor...
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Server Version Suppor...
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Server Version Suppor...
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Server Version Suppor...
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Server Version Suppor...
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Server Version Suppor...
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Server Version Suppor...
Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation"
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Server Version Suppor...
Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation"
Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation"
Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation"
Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation"
Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation"
Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation" (1 LCP?)
Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation"
Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation"
Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation"
Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation"
Re: [Geopriv] I-DAction:draft-ietf-geopriv-http-lo...
Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation"
Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation"
Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation"
Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation"
Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation"
Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation"
Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation"
[Geopriv] FW: I-DAction:draft-ietf-geopriv-http-lo...
[Geopriv] I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-http-locat...
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Should not encourage ...
Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation"
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Should not encourage ...
Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation"
[Geopriv] WG Action: RECHARTER: Geographic Locatio...
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Should not encourage ...
Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation"
Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation"
Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation"
Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation"
Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation"
[Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation"
[Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Should not encourage use ...
Re: [Geopriv] Datum field changes in RFC 3825bis (...
Re: [Geopriv] Datum field changes in RFC 3825bis (...
Re: [Geopriv] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-geopriv...
Re: [Geopriv] Datum field changes in RFC 3825bis (...
Re: [Geopriv] Datum field changes in RFC 3825bis (...
Re: [Geopriv] WGReview:Recharterof GeographicLocat...
Re: [Geopriv] WG Review:Recharterof GeographicLoca...
Re: [Geopriv] WG Review: Recharterof GeographicLoc...
Re: [Geopriv] WG Review: Recharterof GeographicLoc...
Re: [Geopriv] WG Review: Recharterof GeographicLoc...
Re: [Geopriv] WG Review: Recharterof GeographicLoc...
Re: [Geopriv] WG Review: Recharterof GeographicLoc...
Re: [Geopriv] WG Review: Recharter of GeographicLo...
Re: [Geopriv] WG Review: Recharter of GeographicLo...
Re: [Geopriv] WG Review: Recharter of Geographic L...
Re: [Geopriv] WG Review: Recharter of Geographic L...
Re: [Geopriv] WG Review: RecharterofGeographic Loc...
Re: [Geopriv] WG Review: Recharter ofGeographic Lo...
Re: [Geopriv] WG Review: Recharter of Geographic L...
Re: [Geopriv] WG Review: Recharter of Geographic L...
Re: [Geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == no altitud...
Re: [Geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == no altitud...
Re: [Geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == no altitud...
Re: [Geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == no altitud...
Re: [Geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == no altitud...
Re: [Geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == no altitud...
Re: [Geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == no altitud...
Re: [Geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == no altitud...
Re: [Geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == no altitud...
Re: [Geopriv] Datum field changes in RFC 3825bis (...
Re: [Geopriv] Datum field changes in RFC 3825bis (...
Re: [Geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == no altitud...
Re: [Geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == no altitud...
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #9: Split of RFC 3825 Datu...
[Geopriv] [geopriv] #9: Split of RFC 3826 Datum fi...
Re: [Geopriv] Datum field changes in RFC 3825bis (...
Re: [Geopriv] Datum field changes in RFC 3825bis (...
Re: [Geopriv] Datum field changes in RFC 3825bis (...
Re: [Geopriv] Datum field changes in RFC 3825bis (...
Re: [Geopriv] Datum field changes in RFC 3825bis (...
[Geopriv] Datum field changes in RFC 3825bis (affe...
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == ...
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == ...
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == ...
Re: [Geopriv] draft-ietf-geopriv-geo-uri-00 brief ...
[Geopriv] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-civ...
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == ...
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == ...
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == ...
[Geopriv] WG Review: Recharter of Geographic Locat...
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == ...
Re: [Geopriv] The "geo" URI draft
Re: [Geopriv] The "geo" URI draft
Re: [Geopriv] The "geo" URI draft
Re: [Geopriv] The "geo" URI draft
Re: [Geopriv] draft-ietf-geopriv-geo-uri-00 brief ...
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == ...
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == ...
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == ...
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == ...
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == ...
[Geopriv] [geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == no a...
[Geopriv] [geopriv] #7: Identity CRS URN for each ...
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #1: Correct EPSG number fo...
[Geopriv] Document Action: 'Implications of 'retra...
[Geopriv] I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-rfc3825bis...
Re: [Geopriv] HELD ResponseTime parameter withvalu...
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #1: Correct EPSG number fo...
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #1: Correct EPSG number fo...
[Geopriv] Protocol Action: 'Carrying Location Obje...
Re: [Geopriv] -00 Strawman of RFC 3825bis for Review
Re: [Geopriv] -00 Strawman of RFC 3825bis for Review
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #1: Correct EPSG number fo...
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #6: Authorship
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #6: Authorship
[Geopriv] [geopriv] #6: Authorship
Re: [Geopriv] -00 Strawman of RFC 3825bis for Review
Re: [Geopriv] -00 Strawman of RFC 3825bis for Review
Re: [Geopriv] -00 Strawman of RFC 3825bis for Review
Re: [Geopriv] -00 Strawman of RFC 3825bis for Review
Re: [Geopriv] -00 Strawman of RFC 3825bis for Review
Contributors
IETF Blog Poster
RLBarnes
