>Content-Language: fr-FR
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>
>boundary="_000_0FEAC1C09868B34A982F4FB40254B37C275090CE4BMBX02bellcorp_"
>
>I support this request. Let's get those on the WG items list first.
making all 4 WG items first confuses the
situation it appears Cullen seems to want to
avoid, so this doesn't make sense to me.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Guy
>
>
>----------
>De : geopriv-bounces@ietf.org
>[mailto:geopriv-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk
>Envoyé : 3 juillet 2009 03:15
>À : Winterbottom, James
>Cc : geopriv@ietf.org; geopriv-bounces@ietf.org
>Objet : Re: [Geopriv] The next HELD work item
>
>
> > After some discussion with Cullen his preference is very strongly to
> > progress these documents one at a time, when one is done then the next
> > can come in. The rationale for this is so that we can concentrate on
> > getting one document done at a time rather than dilute the attention of
> > the group across a range of documents all at once. This is okay
> > providing we can move the documents at something faster than the current
> > pace has been.
>
>Will we be able to at least clear the hurdle of
>getting all four adopted as WG items straight away?
>
>Ray
>
>--
>Ray Bellis, MA(Oxon) MIET
>Senior Researcher in Advanced Projects, Nominet
>e: ray@nominet.org.uk, t: +44 1865 332211
>_______________________________________________
>Geopriv mailing list
>Geopriv@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
