``CRS label'', and not an URI below, say, `urn:ogc:def:crs:'?
It seems that the separate set of labels, which the proposed
scheme needs, will require its own IANA management, while
there's already a namespace for coordinate systems managed by
OGC Naming Authority (ONA.)
Also note that a geo: URI with the CRS URI specified maps to a
GML `Point' in probably the most straightforward and simple way.
FWIW, I'd suggest either requiring `crs=' to hold an URI, or to
have a separate `crsURI=' parameter for that purpose.
--
FSF associate member #7257
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
