one question on section 7.2 CAtype Registry Update. If you add CAType
40 for INT, how do you want to use this CAType, lets say, in DHCP?
There are just values, and no attributes.
PIDF-LO: <INT N='Room' R='A'>Westerns and Classics</INT>
DHCP: CAtype: 40, Value: Westerns and Classics
where should 'Room' go?
Do you have a thought on this?
cheers
karl heinz
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Rosen, Brian<Brian.Rosen@neustar.biz> wrote:
> I would appreciate some comments on this draft:
> a) Does it makes sense to you to do it this way instead of how we
> currently support "interior" location?
> b) Do the specifics look right (basically, it's an ordered list of
> name/value pairs with no registry and a flag that suggests how to pretty
> print the result)
> c) Should we deprecate the existing mechanism in favor of this, or just
> let the old one lie there?
>
> Several groups that tried to do interior addressing ran into the kind of
> problems the existing mechanism couldn't handle and went for the open
> ended name/value pair idea.
>
> Brian
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
