Tuesday, July 28, 2009

Re: [Geopriv] geo: URI: why crs=, andnotcrsURI=?

>>>>> Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> writes:

[...]

> While a CRS definition will, I guess, include the limits for the
> coordinates, or at least allow for them to be determined in an
> unambigous way, I doubt that these limits could easily be written in
> ABNF for any existing CRS.

s/any/every/, of course.

[...]

--
FSF associate member #7257
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv