Unless I hear arguments to the contrary, I'll include something like this in the next revision of the doc. I'm holding that update on the open issue.
--Martin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geopriv-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:geopriv-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Richard Barnes
> Sent: Tuesday, 6 October 2009 9:53 PM
> To: 'GEOPRIV'
> Subject: [Geopriv] Add IP address prefixes in held-identity-extensions?
>
> Hey all,
>
> I'm at RIPE this week, and it's becoming increasingly clear that in the
> IPv6 environment, it's going to be common for sites/customers to be
> assigned a prefix (e.g., /56 to /64 seem to be common). To some
> extent,
> this logic extends down to hosts as well, since a single interface can
> have multiple IPv6 addresses. Would it make sense to add a v4/v6
> prefix
> identifier type to the HELD identity extension?
>
> <device xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:geopriv:held:id">
> <ip-prefix v="4">192.1.0.0/16</ip-prefix>
> <ip-prefix v="6">2001:DB8:1::/64</ip-prefix>
> </device>
>
> --Richard
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the designated recipient only and may
contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete the original. Any unauthorized use of
this email is prohibited.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[mf2]
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
