Thursday, October 15, 2009

Re: [Geopriv] [Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-barnes-geopriv-policy-uri-00]

Let me phrase it differently: The current HELD and DHCP-LbyR specs do
not require the LS referenced by a URI to have a default-deny policy.
The default policy that seems to be implied by both protocols seems to
be "open until X", where X is a value specified in an expiry attribute.
(In effect, they do what you propose, but with an expiry timer instead
of a URI.) I was assuming those documents as the starting point for the
policy-uri document.

--Richard

Ted Hardie wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Richard Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com> wrote:
>
>
>> I don't really think it's reasonable to assume that a LIS will use a
>> default-deny policy, if for no other reason than that that policy would
>> require any host that wants to use a location reference to go to the
>> additional step of installing policy. In the current proposal, the host
>> only has to do policy if he cares whether the policy is anything other than
>> "open until stated expiration".
>>
>
> I'm not sure that this is required; it seems entirely possible to instead
> give a pointer to a well-known URI that has the policy "open until
> stated expiration". You don't need to create new URIs which duplicate
> that policy, do you?
>
> regards,
>
> Ted
>
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv