On Oct 14, 2009, at 12:56 AM, geopriv issue tracker wrote:
> #27: Subjective network views and policy
> ---------------------------------------
> +------------------------------------
> Reporter: martin.thomson@… | Owner: martin.thomson@…
> Type: defect | Status: new
> Priority: minor | Milestone:
> Component: held-identity-extensions | Version:
> Severity: Candidate WG Document | Keywords: policy identity
> ---------------------------------------
> +------------------------------------
>
> Comment(by martin.thomson@…):
>
> Proposed additions:
>
> ''A new paragraph after the cited section seems appropriate:''
> Authorization policy can be affected by a subjective network view
> if it
> is applied based on an identifier, or it's application depends on
> identifiers. The subjective view presented to the LIS and Rule
> Maker need
> to agree for the two entities to understand policy on the same
> terms. For
> instance, it is possible that the authorization policy applied by
> the LIS
> is entirely incorrect if authorization policy is selected using a
> subjective identifier. Alternatively, policy might be incorrectly
> applied
> if identifiers differ.
>
What is the difference between what is described in the second-to-last
sentence and what is described in the last sentence above?
Alissa
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
