Thanks, call-back was the only advantage I could come up with, so I wanted
to make sure I wasn't missing something.
-Marc-
On 10/27/09 7:18 PM, "Winterbottom, James" <James.Winterbottom@andrew.com>
wrote:
> I guess nothing, but it can be done in the registration. The primary advantage
> of the registration is to support call-back.
>
> Cheers
> James
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Marc Linsner [mailto:mlinsner@cisco.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, 28 October 2009 8:19 AM
>> To: Winterbottom, James
>> Cc: ecrit@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [Ecrit] FW: [Geopriv] Winterbottom-ecrit-direct considered
>>
>> James W.,
>>
>> On 10/27/09 3:53 PM, "Winterbottom, James" <James.Winterbottom@andrew.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi James,
>>>
>>> It is not unauthenticated, the device must have access to an Internet
>> feed,
>>> and that feed is always registered or authenticated in some fashion.
>>>
>>> One of the key proposals of this draft is that the calling device, and
>> please
>>> do not think phone, think computing device (which might be a game
>> console)
>>> does register with the ESRP. This relatively short-term registration is
>> the
>>> way in which call-back is attained. The registration can also be used by
>> the
>>> ESRP to check that the caller is in fact in the calling domain of the
>> PSAP or
>>> at a minimum where the point of presence in the access network is.
>>>
>>
>> What is different in the registration process that allows "the ESRP to
>> check
>> that the caller is in fact in the calling domain of the PSAP" that can't
>> happen via a SIP invite (with no registration)?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Marc-
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
