obsoleted by RD.
Apartment number doesn't go in HNO. Milepost number would, I propose.
Can you cite an example where an apartment number is not a subset of a
street address (that is, you have a RoaD name, what we now call a "House
Number", and then there is some kind of subdivision?
"INT" would define everything that is a subdivision of from the entity
addressed by RD (and it's parts) and what is now called HNO.
You would encode something as simple as a house with an apartment as
<RD>Main</RD>
<HNO>123</HNO>; with the current name
<INT N="Apartment">B</INT>
We would encode I85N Milepost 123 as
<STP>Interstate</STP>
<RD>85</RD>
<POD>N</POD>
<HNP>Milepost</HNP>
<HNO>123</HNO>
Brian
On 10/26/09 2:27 PM, "James Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com> wrote:
> At 01:05 PM 10/26/2009, Rosen, Brian wrote:
>> Yes, Apartment number currently goes in ³UNIT², but my ³INT² proposal would
>> change that.
>
> exactly how many _existing_ CAtypes are you
> planning on obsoleting within your INT proposal?
>
> FWIW - Apartments can be external just as easily
> as internal (and they're fairly uniform in
> numbering) so this one, for now, shouldn't be removed
>
>> It does NOT go in ³HNO².
>
> what does not go in HNO? Apartment or post marker?
>
>
>> Brian
>>
>>
>> On 10/26/09 1:52 PM, "James Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>>> At 11:00 AM 10/26/2009, Rosen, Brian wrote:
>>>> In the original PIDF-LO definition in
>> RFC4119, we have a field called "House
>>>> Number" (and a "House Number Suffix"). Is this field misnamed?
>>>>
>>>> Suppose you had a "milepost" on a road, or on a railroad, or even a hiking
>>>> trail. Would you expect the marker number (which is usually miles or
>>>> kilometers as measured from an end of the
>> road/railroad/trail) to appear in
>>>> the "HNO" field?
>>>>
>>>> I think yes, which means that the field is misnamed. I would suspect that
>>>> the appetite of the work group to actually change the name of the field
>>>> would be low, although I would probably like to do something that would
>>>> generalize the use of the field.
>>>>
>>>> A more subtle question. In 4119, under HNO, it says "numeric part only".
>>>> If the post marker was "125.5" is that numeric enough, or would we have to
>>>> use the suffix?
>>>
>>> you're differentiating this sufficiently from apartment number, right?
>>>
>>> because I see a street address belonging to an apartment complex,
>>> then an apartment number belonging to an individual apartment.
>>>
>>> If you are saying the HNO is the street address "number" (and not
>>> confused by the apartment number) - then this generalization is agreeable.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Brian
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Geopriv mailing list
>>>> Geopriv@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>>>
>>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
