Re: [Geopriv] The next HELD work item

> making all 4 WG items first confuses the
> situation it appears Cullen seems to want to
> avoid, so this doesn't make sense to me.

Yes, it may (slightly) confuse it.

However as other SDOs are already developing specifications that depend on them it would be highly preferable that they are at least recognised IETF WG drafts rather than individual drafts.

Ray

--
Ray Bellis, MA(Oxon) MIET
Senior Researcher in Advanced Projects, Nominet
e: ray@nominet.org.uk, t: +44 1865 332211