agreed?
At 06:17 PM 7/1/2009, Thomson, Martin wrote:
>Except for the fact that this is only possible in _different_ DHCP
>responses. If it were in the same response, concatenation would be
>applied and client behaviour would be undefined (and unpredictable).
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Spencer Dawkins [mailto:spencer@wonderhamster.org]
> > Sent: Thursday, 2 July 2009 12:34 AM
> > To: Thomson, Martin; bernard_aboba@hotmail.com; James M. Polk
> > Cc: geopriv@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Server Version Support (was:
> > Should not encourage use of "old" encoding)
> >
> > > Do we want to have text saying something about the current behavior
> > of
> > >
> > > "As a matter of practice within DHCP - a server sending one
> > > version
> > > of Option 123 towards a client followed by the other version
> > (in
> > > the
> > > same response or a separate response) does not allow clients
> > to
> > > retain both versions in memory. Receiving two copies of the
> > same
> > > Option causes the client to replace the old information with
> > the
> > > new information of the same Option (123 in this case)."
> > >
> > > This is useful guidance.
> > >
> > > James
> >
> > I agree with providing guidance like this in an obviously non-normative
> > way - it's not something everyone knows.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Spencer
> >
> >
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>This message is for the designated recipient only and may
>contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
>If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
>immediately and delete the original. Any unauthorized use of
>this email is prohibited.
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>[mf2]
>_______________________________________________
>Geopriv mailing list
>Geopriv@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
