as the new version is submitted.
Thank you for addressing my concerns.
Dan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net]
> Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 12:40 PM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Cc: geopriv@ietf.org
> Subject: draft-ietf-geopriv-l7-lcp-ps DISCUSS by Dan
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> Regarding your DISCUSS:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/draft-ietf-geopriv-l7-l
cp-ps/comment/
97878/
[IESG Evaluation DISCUSS]
1. Since this document was written IEEE 802.1AB was approved and
deployed. I suggest the following change in Section 5:
OLD:
Switch/Port Number:
This identifier is available only in certain networks, such as
enterprise networks, typically available via proprietary protocols
like CDP or, in the future, 802.1ab.
NEW:
Ethernet Switch (Bridge)/Port Number:
This identifier is available only in certain networks, such as
enterprise networks, typically available via the IEEE 802.1AB
protocol [xx] or proprietary protocols like the Cisco Discovery
Protocol (CDP) [yy]
Adding informative references would also be nice for IEEE 802.1AB and
CDP would also be useful.
[xx] IEEE 802.1AB-2005 IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area
Networks Station and Media Access Control Connectivity Discovery -
http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/download/802.1AB-2005.pdf
Somebody should be able to provide a reference to CDP.
[hannes] Fixed.
2. The four requirements in the Security Considerations section deserve
to be written with 2119 capitalized MUST.
[hannes] Fixed.
Regarding your COMMENT:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/draft-ietf-geopriv-l7-lcp-ps/comm
ent/
97879/
There are plenty of acronyms not expanded at the first occurence: USB,
DSL, PPoE, etc.
[hannes] Good point. Fixed.
A new version can be found here:
http://www.tschofenig.priv.at/svn/draft-tschofenig-geopriv-l7-lcp-ps/dra
ft-i
etf-geopriv-l7-lcp-ps-10.txt
Ciao
Hannes
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
