Wednesday, July 15, 2009

[Geopriv] location quality should be in the PIDF

draft-thomson-geopriv-location-quality proposes to add quality requirements
to a HELD request, and quality "results" to a HELD response.

Taking the response first, I don't think it is appropriate to return the
quality of the PIDF in something other than a PIDF. In particular, if I
convey the PIDF to some other entity, that entity needs to know what the
quality of the result is.

I think inferring quality by, for example, returning a circle with a radius
rather than a point with uncertainty and confidence is wrong. The PIDF
should return the point, and express the quality. I want to add elements to
PIDF to express the quality of the data provided.

Turning to the request, I would like the ability for the SIP presence
mechanism to be able to request a specific quality. One way to do that is
to specify the quality with a filter. We've been having a discussion on
this point. In this email, I'm expressing support for that notion, using
common syntax between a HELD request and a SIP Presence subscription: I want
to define an XML namespace used to request location quality, which can be
used in a HELD request (including a deref request) and a SIP Presence
filter, with the same syntax and semantics.

Brian

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv