Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Re: [Geopriv] CONSENSUS CALL: Civic address extensibility

Yes, yes, and yes.

Carl

----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard L. Barnes" <rbarnes@bbn.com>
To: <geopriv@ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 2:05 PM
Subject: [Geopriv] CONSENSUS CALL: Civic address extensibility


> Hey all,
>
> As a follow-up to our virtual interim this afternoon, the chairs would
> like to make a consensus call on the following questions:
>
> A. Should this working group do something about civic address
> extensibility?
>
> B. Should we create a single extension element that can express
> registered, "global" elements?
>
> C. Should we create a mechanism for private/local extensions in the DHCP
> civic address format, and recommendations about how to create
> private/local extensions in DHCP and XML?
>
> Please send responses to the list no later than Friday, 3 December 2010.
>
> Thanks,
> --Richard
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv