Document: draft-ietf-geopriv-rfc3825bis-12
Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol Options for
Coordinate-based Location Configuration Information
Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern
Review Date: 16-Oct-2010
IETF LC End Date: 2010-10-25
IESG Telechat date: N/A
Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard
Major issues:
Minor issues:
I wonder if the recommendation at the end of section 2.2.1.2
on Server Version Selection should be strengthened (and the v4 usage
weakened) a little. The text current says that when there are known
to be some v0-only DHCP v4 clients, the v0 should be sent. It seems to
me that unless it is known that all clients that use geolocation will
support
v1, then v0 should be sent. I do understand that this version problem
is difficult to resolve.
Nits/editorial comments:
--
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Reporter: bernard_aboba@… | Owner: bernard_aboba@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: draft-ietf-geopriv-3825bis
Component: rfc3825bis | Version: 1.0
Severity: Submitted WG Document | Keywords:
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Ticket URL: <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/geopriv/trac/ticket/40>
geopriv <http://tools.ietf.org/geopriv/>
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
