Cheers
James
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Barnes [mailto:rbarnes@bbn.com]
Sent: Tue 9/15/2009 4:16 PM
To: Winterbottom, James
Cc: GEOPRIV; Marc Linsner
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] WG2LC: draft-ietf-geopriv-held-identity-extensions-00.txt
Sorry, meant to refer to this paragraph:
"
I believe that Bernard Aboba has stated on a number of occasions very
clear cases where the device can/must provide an identifier other than
its return-routable IP address to the LIS in order to obtain its location.
"
A description of these occasions would be helpful.
--Richard
Richard Barnes wrote:
>> I don't agree with the proposed title change for two reasons.
>> Firstly, the proposed change describes one possible usage of the
>> elements specified in the document. Secondly, the chnage doesn't
>> describe what is actually specified in the document. I believe that
>> if the title "Use of Device Identity in HTTP-Enabled Location
>> Delivery (HELD)" is accurate for what the document describes.
>
> Is there an email or something that you could provide as a reference,
> just so we're all on the same page with respect to which scenarios we're
> talking about?
>
> Thanks,
> --Richard
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the designated recipient only and may
contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete the original. Any unauthorized use of
this email is prohibited.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[mf2]
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
