An audio recording is available at https://cisco.webex.com/ciscosales/lsr.php?AT=pb&SP=MC&rID=40370402&rKey=2d44cf3511d663ea
Summary (prepared by Alissa and Richard, with thanks to Marc for
taking notes):
Intro
-- No agenda bashes
GEOPRIV Arch discussion
-- Definition of a LIS
-- Looked at how it's used colloquially, other SDOs' definitions
-- Marc: Heartburn over "LCP"
-- LIS shouldn't have to worry about policy
-- Don't want LC defined as just giving a Target its own location
-- Hannes: Trying to make what we're talking about more explicit
-- James P: Keith noted that we can't rule out DHCP as an LC
protocol, which means arch has to be consistent
** Marc: LCP should be "LIS doesn't do any checking"
-> e.g., identifiers that aren't verified by the underlying
protocol, no explicit policy-checking mechanism
-- Device vs. Target
-- James P will more clearly articulate his issue on the list
LOC-FILTERS
-- James P is concerned about conflict with location-conveyance
-- Hannes will verify that there's no conflict
-- James P and Carl will provide reviews by Hiroshima
-- Hannes trying to work out what to do with error codes
-- Recommendation to figure out semantics and then check with Adam
DHCP-LBYR-URI
-- This rev tries to resolve Hannes' comments
-- Accepts most of them
-- Didn't understand a few
-- Hannes: Concerned about authorization models
-- James P and Hannes agreed that the auth model issue appears to
have been resolved
-- Richard: Give people time to read most recent list posting
-- Richard: HTTP URIs still missing
-- James P will get with Ted to figure this out
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
