Tuesday, September 29, 2009

Re: [Geopriv] Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option-06

What's the argument against IRIs here? That these URIs aren't
user-facing? Not having done much with i8n, I'm not sure what the
relevant norms are here.

--Richard


Thomson, Martin wrote:
>> and LocationUri a UTF-8 string.
>
> URIs are ASCII, no need for UTF-8 in this case. We don't need or want IRIs here.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is for the designated recipient only and may
> contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
> If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
> immediately and delete the original. Any unauthorized use of
> this email is prohibited.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [mf2]
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv