"
I believe that Bernard Aboba has stated on a number of occasions very
clear cases where the device can/must provide an identifier other than
its return-routable IP address to the LIS in order to obtain its location.
"
A description of these occasions would be helpful.
--Richard
Richard Barnes wrote:
>> I don't agree with the proposed title change for two reasons.
>> Firstly, the proposed change describes one possible usage of the
>> elements specified in the document. Secondly, the chnage doesn't
>> describe what is actually specified in the document. I believe that
>> if the title "Use of Device Identity in HTTP-Enabled Location
>> Delivery (HELD)" is accurate for what the document describes.
>
> Is there an email or something that you could provide as a reference,
> just so we're all on the same page with respect to which scenarios we're
> talking about?
>
> Thanks,
> --Richard
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
