Thanks for the thorough review - i will include the changes into the
next version together with other last call comments that i might
receive.
Some additional comments:
> Please consider the following patch.
>
> Among the issues I've considered:
>
> * the name of the planet Earth is constantly uncapitalized; (or
> is it written this way for a purpose? or is there something I
> don't understand?)
Not intentional, will change that in the next version.
> * actually, I don't know why a hyphen (-, -, HYPHEN-MINUS)
> is used instead of a proper M-dash (—, EM DASH), but I
> guess that there's some implementation restriction justifying
> that; anyway, <workgroup> has the M-dash encoded with two
> hyphens instead (--), so I changed all the other instances to
> match;
Well, intenet drafts and RFCs have to be pure ASCII, so if your comment
is about the text, then there's no way of using an M-dash. Usually, the
RFC editor team would change single dashes into double hashes at their
discretion.
> * the names of the parameters are written both single-quoted
> ('u') and double-quoted ("u"); as I didn't know whether this
> was done on a purpose, I've left it that way;
I will change it to just one way - you are right, that's confusing (and
intententional).
> * one more nitpick: the whitespace is a bit weird; namely,
> blanks and TABs (ASCII: HT, code 9) are somewhat mixed, and
> there're a plenty of lines which end with a sequence of
> blanks, or are comprised of blanks entirely; as it makes no
> difference to the XML parser, I've left it that way, too.
>
Yes, this comes from changing the document over and over... Again, the
RFC Editor would typically take care of that, but i will try cleaning
out the document before we finally submit it to the RFC editors to make
their jobs easier.
Thanks again!
Alex
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
