<oneingray@gmail.com> writes
> The document seems to imply the contrary:
>
> The optional "crs" URI parameter described below may be used by
> future specifications to define the use of CRSes other than WGS-84.
> This is primarily intended to cope with the case of another CRS
> replacing WGS-84 as the predominantly used one, rather than allowing
> the arbitrary use of thousands of CRSes for the URI (which would
> clearly affect interopability). [...]
I should like to see specific reference to the use-case of
non-terrestrial (e.g. lunar, Martian) coordinates.
--
Andy Mabbett
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
