Thanks,
--Richard
On Mar 23, 2010, at 9:46 AM, Richard Barnes wrote:
> Still working on reserving a room for this. If all else fails,
> let's meet at the registration desk at 11:45 and find a spot.
> Either way, once a place is established (via either method), it will
> be announced on this list.
>
> --Richard
>
>
>
> On Mar 22, 2010, at 9:36 AM, Richard Barnes wrote:
>
>> Given the IESG feedback, I'll call it for Tuesday lunch.
>> --Richard
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mar 22, 2010, at 9:31 AM, James M. Polk wrote:
>>
>>> Richard
>>>
>>> Do you have this figured out enough to schedule?
>>>
>>> James
>>>
>>> At 04:20 PM 3/21/2010, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
>>>> Same here. We have an IESG meting on Tuesday morning - so you
>>>> would lose
>>>> all AD's. Tuesday lunch works.
>>>>
>>>> Dan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>>> > From: geopriv-bounces@ietf.org
>>>> > [mailto:geopriv-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Cullen Jennings
>>>> > Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2010 9:58 PM
>>>> > To: Richard Barnes
>>>> > Cc: geopriv@ietf.org
>>>> > Subject: Re: [Geopriv] Location Coherence (LoCo) Bar BoF
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Tuesday lunch would probably work for me. Breakfast would not
>>>> >
>>>> > On Mar 21, 2010, at 12:12 , Richard Barnes wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > Someone pointed out that Tuesday lunch conflicts with the
>>>> > ISOC IPv6 meeting. Any major issues with Tuesday breakfast?
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Mar 21, 2010, at 9:54 AM, Richard Barnes wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > >> Wednesday lunch is looking worse and worse. How would
>>>> > people feel about Tuesday lunch? If I don't hear any
>>>> > objections by, say, early this afternoon, I'll go ahead and
>>>> > make the change.
>>>> > >> --Richard
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> On Mar 17, 2010, at 4:05 PM, Richard Barnes wrote:
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>> Hey all,
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> This email is announcing a Bar BoF at the upcoming IETF
>>>> > meeting on the topic of "location coherence", to be held
>>>> > somewhere in the vicinity of the GEOPRIV meeting, probably
>>>> > during the lunch break on Wednesday, 24 March. Since the
>>>> > topic is a little peripheral to GEOPRIV, I've also set up a
>>>> > Google Group for discussions here:
>>>> > >>> <http://groups.google.com/group/geo-loco>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> What I mean by "coherence" is this:
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> In order for location-based Internet applications to
>>>> > work, there are
>>>> > >>> several pieces that need to work together, including
>>>> > >>> -- Positioning sevices
>>>> > >>> -- Location protocols
>>>> > >>> -- Location APIs-- Application protocols that use location
>>>> Right
>>>> > >>> now, there are many different implementations out there
>>>> > for each layer in this stack, each with its own set of
>>>> > semantics for location related concepts -- not just the
>>>> > location that can be expressed (e.g., lat/long/accuracy vs.
>>>> > polygons), but also ancillary ideas like types of location
>>>> > (civic vs geodetic) and supporting information like signal
>>>> > measurements.
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> In the spirit of allowing different organizations to add
>>>> > value at different levels of this stack, while still
>>>> > maintaining interoperability, it would seem like a good idea
>>>> > to have a coherent set of semantics for location concepts --
>>>> > a common data model, if not common protocols and APIs.
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> Topics for discussion could include:
>>>> > >>> -- How can we map out the space of things that exist today?
>>>> > >>> -- What sorts of location systems would this effort try
>>>> > to encompass? Protocols and/or APIs? Positioning and/or
>>>> conveyance?
>>>> > >>> -- What's the proper venue for this work? GEOPRIV? A
>>>> > new IETF WG? Somewhere else?
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> As an example of the sort of thing that might come out of
>>>> > this work, a colleague and I put together a partial draft
>>>> > looking at mappings between different location protocols:
>>>> > >>> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-doran-geopriv-proto-map-01>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> Thanks for taking the time to read through this, and I
>>>> > look forward to some useful discussions next week.
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> Best,
>>>> > >>> --Richard
>>>> > >>> _______________________________________________
>>>> > >>> Geopriv mailing list
>>>> > >>> Geopriv@ietf.org
>>>> > >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >
>>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>>> > > Geopriv mailing list
>>>> > > Geopriv@ietf.org
>>>> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Cullen Jennings
>>>> > For corporate legal information go to:
>>>> > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>>>> index.html
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > Geopriv mailing list
>>>> > Geopriv@ietf.org
>>>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>>>> >
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Geopriv mailing list
>>>> Geopriv@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geopriv mailing list
>> Geopriv@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
