"Considerations for Civic Addresses in the Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO): Guidelines and IANA Registry Definition".
--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5774&eid=2066
--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Alfred Hoenes <ah@TR-Sys.de>
Section: 1, 6th para
Original Text
-------------
Section 3.4 of [RFC4776] also contains instructions on the creation
| of civic address considerations documents on page 8. This document
updates that section and replaces said instructions with Sections 4
and 5 of this memo.
Corrected Text
--------------
Section 3.4 of [RFC4776] also contains instructions on the creation
| of civic address considerations documents on page 9. This document
updates that section and replaces said instructions with Sections 4
and 5 of this memo.
Notes
-----
Rationale:
This indeed refers to the second paragraph on page _9_ of RFC 4776.
Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
--------------------------------------
RFC5774 (draft-ietf-geopriv-civic-address-recommendations-03)
--------------------------------------
Title : Considerations for Civic Addresses in the Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO): Guidelines and IANA Registry Definition
Publication Date : March 2010
Author(s) : K. Wolf, A. Mayrhofer
Category : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Source : Geographic Location/Privacy
Area : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure
Stream : IETF
Verifying Party : IESG
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
