> 1. In the case of emergency services (such as E911 within the
> United States), local or national laws may require that
> accurate location information be transmitted in certain
> defined emergency call situations. The Geopriv Working
> Group MUST facilitate this situation.
> "
>
> That last sentence just means that the privacy rule systems developed
> by GEOPRIV must allow a Location Server / Rule Holder to overrule a
> Rule Maker, which both -policy and -policy-uri clearly do. So together
> with the above ECRIT document, I really don't think that draft-ietf-
> geopriv-policy needs to say anything on this matter.
The model simply views legislature or constitution as another Rule Maker, does it not?
Perhaps the correct way to think of it is that your *meta policy* has some Rule Makers with higher priority rules than others.
Setting policy is outside the remit of the group; setting *meta policy* is similarly beyond our humble powers. Enabling it? That we can do.
You might not that the combining rules in common-policy don't inherently allow for override rules. Applying multiple policies in sequence can be used to produce that effect.
--Martin
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
