> Proposed text:
> "
> A policy URI is only valid while the corresponding location URI set is valid. A location server MUST NOT respond to any requests to a policy URIs once the corresponding location URI set has expired. This expiry time is specified by the 'expires' attribute in the HELD locationResponse or the 'Valid-For' LuriType in DHCP.
> "
>
> This works. I would add "Re-use of policy URIs with subsequent location URIs is NOT RECOMMENDED even if the rule maker and location are the same." That may be me being paranoid, so I'm okay if you prefer to leave it out. I can't really see this being done by anyone following the spirit of the other recommendations, but paranoia is paranoia, you know?
I think it would actually be simpler to say that the location server MUST generate a new policy URI for a new location URI. Since that's how I would implement it anyway :)
> Ok, I think I understand you better now. I can agree that overloading DELETE makes sense, especially
>
> Was this "does not make sense"?
Yep.
--Richard
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
