For your convenience, the referenced patent is titled "Reducing satellite signal interference in a global positioning system receiver"
<http://www.google.com/patents?id=YqsIAAAAEBAJ>
As far as I can tell, this has basically no relationship to the data format defined in RFC 4119. Even if the geolocation fields in a PIDF-LO document were filled from an infringing GPS receiver, it would be the receiver that caused the infringement, not the PIDF-LO encoding.
--Richard
Begin forwarded message:
> From: IETF Secretariat <ietf-ipr@ietf.org>
> Date: May 24, 2011 1:21:11 PM EDT
> To: jon.peterson@neustar.biz
> Cc: gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com, rjsparks@nostrum.com, geopriv@ietf.org, rbarnes@bbn.com, acooper@cdt.org, ipr-announce@ietf.org, housley@vigilsec.com
> Subject: IPR Disclosure: Qualcomm Incorporated's Statement about IPR related to RFC 4119
>
> Dear Jon Peterson:
>
> An IPR disclosure that pertains to your RFC entitled "A Presence-based GEOPRIV
> Location Object Format" (RFC4119) was submitted to the IETF Secretariat on
> 2011-05-24 and has been posted on the "IETF Page of Intellectual Property Rights
> Disclosures" (https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1560/). The title of the IPR
> disclosure is "Qualcomm Incorporated's Statement about IPR related to RFC 4119."
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>
>
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
