I think it would actually be simpler to say that the location server MUST generate a new policy URI for a new location URI. Since that's how I would implement it anyway :)
> This works. I would add "Re-use of policy URIs with subsequent location URIs is NOT RECOMMENDED even if the rule maker and location are the same." That may be me being paranoid, so I'm okay if you prefer to leave it out. I can't really see this being done by anyone following the spirit of the other recommendations, but paranoia is paranoia, you know?
Even better.
thanks,
Ted
