(except for <snapshot>), without requiring any new XML. (And
<snapshot> should be a policy extension, anyway.)
Generality: This document is not specific to HELD, so that, e.g., it
can be used with DHCP.
On Jul 30, 2010, at 2:07 PM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
> Why not use the existing HELD Context document?
>
>
> On 30.07.2010 14:05, Richard L. Barnes wrote:
>> The only concern raised in the meeting with regard to draft-barnes-
>> geopriv-policy-uri was when Hannes noted that the exchange could be
>> made more efficient (in the HELD context) overlaying the policy
>> interactions on a HELD transaction. For example, the client could
>> provide policy data in a <locationRequest> object, and the server
>> could specify policy it intends to use in the <locationResponse>.
>> I think we should not do this.
>
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
