On 30.07.2010 14:05, Richard L. Barnes wrote:
> The only concern raised in the meeting with regard to
> draft-barnes-geopriv-policy-uri was when Hannes noted that the
> exchange could be made more efficient (in the HELD context) overlaying
> the policy interactions on a HELD transaction. For example, the
> client could provide policy data in a <locationRequest> object, and
> the server could specify policy it intends to use in the
> <locationResponse>. I think we should not do this.
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
