near to consensus on "Option C." I'd like to suggest that Brian in his
editorial role try to work this approach into the current draft and
share it back with the design team and then the list.
Alissa
On Apr 11, 2010, at 8:20 PM, Thomson, Martin wrote:
> James Polk writes:
>>> In Geodetic:
>>> -- Normal: outline of the building
>>
>> we should discuss this - as I think this (point "outline of the
>> building") is problematic. What if you are at Yankees stadium or
>> Soldier's Field. Where is the point "outline of the building"? that
>> still means Yankees stadium or Soldier's Field?
>
> That depends. It might be reasonable to use a shape that encloses
> either the stadium or the enclosing grounds.
>
>> I think for Geo, we
>> have to agree if the geo points to a property, and then there can be
>> either:
>>
>> - a reference point within that property aside from the macro geo
>> coodinates, or
>> - us the exact geo as the reference point to then do an offset from.
>>
>> I know James and Martin will balk at this latter choice, saying why
>> not just recalculate the external geo -- but I think that isn't so
>> obvious, but it may be.
>
> Not so much as you might think. While I always favour the inclusion
> of more information, and Richard's presentation is what I would
> consider ideal, this usage isn't that offensive.
>
> A recipient that receives the information is not presented with more
> precision than there is accuracy, since there is no claim made with
> respect to accuracy.
>
> --Martin
>
>> James
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
