I know this isn't good form, but I have to observe that the document
is a bit of a relic. While there is nothing inherently wrong with it,
I worry about the relevancy of the mechanisms that it is providing,
particularly in light of the location obfuscation conclusions.
On 13 February 2012 15:18, Alissa Cooper <acooper@cdt.org> wrote:
> This is a GEOPRIV Working Group Last Call for comments on
> draft-ietf-geopriv-policy-25
>
> Please send your comments to the list by 27 February 2012. As always, please remember to send a note in if you've read the document and have no other comments other than "its ready to go" - we need those as much as we need "I found a problem."
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
