(I've confirmed with IANA that they can handle a change made this way).
There have been discussions in several groups about registry maintenance with some
confusion about whether changes can be made to an existing schema. Our XML experts
(Peter in this case) assure us that schema changes are OK.
In most cases, I would ask that a change to a registration like this be done with a document.
That's definitely required if we're doing anything more than correcting an obvious mistake.
In this case, however, it is obvious that these values were intended to be included in the
affected list from the beginning.
I plan to approve this erratum a week from today. If you believe this is not the right thing to do,
please speak now.
RjS
-------- Original Message --------
| Subject: | [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4480 (3121) |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:54:39 -0800 (PST) |
| From: | RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> |
| To: | hgs+simple@cs.columbia.edu, vkg@lucent.com, pkyzivat@cisco.com, jdrosen@cisco.com, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com, rjsparks@nostrum.com, ben@nostrum.com, hisham.khartabil@gmail.com |
| CC: | stpeter@stpeter.im, simple@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org |
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4480, "RPID: Rich Presence Extensions to the Presence Information Data Format (PIDF)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4480&eid=3121 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Section: 7.2 Original Text ------------- <xs:element name="looking-for-work" type="empty" /> <xs:element name="meal" type="empty" /> Corrected Text -------------- <xs:element name="looking-for-work" type="empty" /> <xs:element name="lunch" type="empty" /> <xs:element name="meal" type="empty" /> Notes ----- Erratum #2959 claimed that the element "lunch" needs to be removed from the specification since it is not included in the schema. However, the schema was in error. This erratum corrects the schema so that, if approved, IANA can update the information at http://www.iana.org/assignments/xml-registry/schema/pidf/status/rpid.xsd Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC4480 (draft-ietf-simple-rpid-10) -------------------------------------- Title : RPID: Rich Presence Extensions to the Presence Information Data Format (PIDF) Publication Date : July 2006 Author(s) : H. Schulzrinne, V. Gurbani, P. Kyzivat, J. Rosenberg Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions Area : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
