Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Re: [Geopriv] Continued discussion of draft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option on the dhcwg list

Just so I'm clear:
>
> And, if the valid time is used by the client app (presumably the app that manages handing out the LURI to other hosts) as an indication of when to request an Information-request for the LURI, the mechanism would be compatible with DHCP clients.
>
The "Information-request for the LURI" is a DHCP client request to the DHCP server, right? You are just concerned that this request doesn't (necessarily) request an IP address lease renewal.

If that's it, I see no problem. We need an explicit lifetime for the L-URI in the return from the request which is totally independent of the IP address lease time.

Brian

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv