Friday, December 9, 2011

Re: [Geopriv] Continued discussion of draft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option on the dhcwg list

A good, clear summary.

You didn't mention access control policy, but that's probably OK for
the purposes of the discussion at hand.

On the last paragraph, I think that Richard suggested that there be a
recommendation (though not a 2119 SHOULD) that the expiration be
longer than the lease time. The only reason being that it's probably
sensible to ensure that a host always has a valid location URI.

--Martin

On 9 December 2011 07:18, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote:
> Please take a look at
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/current/msg12238.html
>
> If you have anything to add, or more importantly, if you see something I got
> wrong that you need
> to correct, please do so on the dhcwg list.
>
> RjS
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv