Thanks!
RjS
On Nov 2, 2011, at 5:18 PM, Thomson, Martin wrote:
> On 2011-11-03 at 08:15:01, Robert Sparks wrote:
>> (Including the geopriv list on this reply).
>>
>> Martin - there's one change you made that I think you need to adjust.
>> In response to Elwyn's suggestion about Appendix A, Req 9 below,
>> you've added some 2119 text to that appendix which isn't right. Is
>> there a place you can say what you want to say in the body of the document?
>
> Yeah, and that was stupid of me.
>
> The security considerations already contains a statement to this effect:
>
> Location URIs MUST only be disclosed to authorized Location
> Recipients.
>
> As for the 2119 language, a reference to the above statement should do:
>
> OLD:
> In order to comply with these rules, a Location Recipient
> MUST NOT redistribute a location URI without express
> permission. Depending on the access control model, the
> location URI might be secret (see Section 3.3 of
> [RFC5808]).
> NEW:
> For location URIs that are use possession as a component of
> authorization, the protecting the secrecy of the URI is
> necessary in order to comply with this requirement (see
> Section 6).
>
> --Martin
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
