Brian
On Jan 25, 2011, at 3:43 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
> I argued that the chosen approach is not the one I would like to see moving forward, and the description in the document replicates text we already have in other documents.
>
> In that sense I do not want this document as a WG item.
>
> On Jan 12, 2011, at 4:18 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>
>> Now that we have a milestone to "submit recommendations for LIS discovery conducted by hosts behind residential gateways as Informational," I'd like to call for WG adoption of draft-thomson-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-04. Please respond to the list by January 19, 2011 about adopting this document as a WG item.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alissa
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geopriv mailing list
>> Geopriv@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
