this one, acknowledging that text changes can and will likely be made
before WGLC, and that the updated milestone is restricted to the first-
party case.
Alissa
On Jan 25, 2011, at 2:24 PM, Brian Rosen wrote:
> Is there an alternative document that you want to use as a basis for
> the milestone?
>
> Brian
>
> On Jan 25, 2011, at 3:43 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
>
>> I argued that the chosen approach is not the one I would like to
>> see moving forward, and the description in the document replicates
>> text we already have in other documents.
>>
>> In that sense I do not want this document as a WG item.
>>
>> On Jan 12, 2011, at 4:18 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>>
>>> Now that we have a milestone to "submit recommendations for LIS
>>> discovery conducted by hosts behind residential gateways as
>>> Informational," I'd like to call for WG adoption of draft-thomson-
>>> geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-04. Please respond to the list by
>>> January 19, 2011 about adopting this document as a WG item.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Alissa
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Geopriv mailing list
>>> Geopriv@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geopriv mailing list
>> Geopriv@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>
>
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
