I looked at the available IPRs and based on what I have seen I suggest to go ahead with the publication of the geopriv-arch document.
Ciao
Hannes
On Oct 12, 2010, at 6:58 PM, Richard L. Barnes wrote:
> <hat type="chair"/>
>
> Hey all,
>
> Two IPR disclosures have been filed with regard to draft-ietf-geopriv-arch, one from Qualcomm and one from Enterasys:
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1394/>
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1402/>
>
> The Qualcomm disclosure relates to an unpublished US patent application, so no information is available from the USPTO website. Robert and I have asked Qualcomm for further technical details, but have not received any. The Enterasys disclosure relates to three issued patents.
>
> The question for the group is whether the WG is comfortable moving these documents forward given these IPR disclosures. If you have thoughts on this question, please send them to the list no later than Monday, 18 Oct.
>
> Thanks,
> --Richard
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
