> document stage
> issue and apologize for getting OGC Member comments into the
> process so
> late.
Carl,
sorry if that came out wrong - i fully appreciate that the you took the
effort of getting the document reviewed in the OGC community, and also
comiled the comments - it was "just in time" to get the issues below
into the final document.
> Responses to your questions etc are below.
I've commented on your responses below.
> > For clarification, i could add the single word "depth" to
> the sentence
> > cited, so that it reads: "... altitudes below the WGS-84
> reference geoid
> > (depths) are signed negative..."
> >
> > Would that help?
>
> Yes, this would help.
I have now instructed the RFC Editors to modify the sentence as follows:
Coordinates in the Southern and Western hemispheres as well as
altitudes below the WGS-84 reference geoid (depths) are signed
negative with a leading dash.
> > - ISO 6709:
> Perhaps just a note that geo URI can be mapped to 6709 as a
> recognition of
> 6709 would remove majority of concerns. FYI - GML incorporates 6709.
I haven't yet instructed the RFC Editors to do so, but given that you
say it would remove major concerns, i will draft up an (informative)
note to be included in the final RFC. I will also add an informative
reference to the ISO standard document.
Alex
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
