I cleared my Discuss.
Jari
Hannes Tschofenig kirjoitti:
> Hi Jari,
>
> Martin and I had proposed new text based on the comments you and
> others raised (see below).
>
> In particularly the following text has been changed:
>
> "
> An implementation MUST support <ns-bindings> to replace the namespace
> prefix. The XPath expression MUST start with a '//' followed by a
> single element. No other form of XPath expression is supported. The
> <changed> element comes with a few attributes but only the 'by'
> attribute MUST be implemented by this specification.
> "
>
>
> I hope the new version meets your expectation.
>
>
> Ciao
> Hannes
>
> -----
>
>
> Discuss (2010-03-10)
> This is a good document and I was ready to ballot Yes. However, like
> other reviewers I had trouble with the normative requirements. In my
> case Section 3.3 said:
>
> An implementation MUST support the functionality as shown in Figure 3
> with <ns-bindings> replacing the prefix. No other variant is
> supported.
>
> I do not understand what to implement based on this. In particular,
> Section 3.3 has also Figure 4 that shows another variant. Is only the
> first one required to be supported? What exactly does "MUST support
> this example snippet of XML" mean?
>
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
